| ai.viXra.org > Relativity and Cosmology > 2609 |
|
 |
| ai.viXra.org > Relativity and Cosmology > 2609 |
|
|
[11] ai.viXra.org:2609.0074 [pdf] submitted on 2026-09-28 20:38:33
Authors: Sayo Asanagi
Comments: 5 Pages.
We explore a single hypothesis: that in an emergent ("it-from-bit") spacetime the microscopic information-propagation velocity cinfo need not coincide with the macroscopic light speed cmacro, their ratio being a function of the local curvature or entanglement density. Embedding this kinematically on a Schwarzschild background through a curvature-dependent factor ∆ = (cinfo/cmacro)2 = 1 + ϵK/K∗, we find that a single sign parameter ϵ generates two distinct spacetimes. For ϵ > 0 (pattern A) the geometry is a charge-free Reissner—Nordstr¨om type with an information horizon displaced inward of rs, satisfying the energy conditions. For ϵ < 0 (pattern B) a double-zero design ∆ = u|u| produces a genuine signature change across a null face rc, opening a finite Euclidean shelland a two-time core; the Kretschmann scalar remains finite at rc and the surface gravity vanishes. Both branches terminate black-hole evaporation in remnants and resolve the information paradox by opposite mechanisms (leakage vs. freezing). We show that the degenerate face suppresses classicalmass inflation from exponential to power-law growth (confirmed by linear and nonlinear numerics), and that pattern B falls into the single stated exception of the semiclassical inner-horizon no-go theorem because its degenerate face is the outermost horizon. We find no viable direct observational signature at any scale for a Planck-normalised K∗; instead we connect the central hypothesis to two established frameworks—Lieb—Robinson bounds on the micro side and analogue gravity on the macro side—and derive a concrete, falsifiable analogue prediction: a 85Rb condensate with an engineered double-zero scattering-length profile yields a phonon pair-production spectrum whose high-k cutoff differs by nearly two orders of magnitude from that of a sudden signature change, withno thermal pedestal. All results are reproduced by an accompanying open-source code package.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[10] ai.viXra.org:2609.0043 [pdf] submitted on 2026-09-19 07:51:16
Authors: Vladimir S. Netchitailo
Comments: 56 Pages.
The World—Universe Model (WUM) proposes that the physical World is a finite, boundless three-dimensional Hypersphere forming the surface of an expanding four-dimensional Nucleus embedded in the Eternal Universe. The Nucleus expands along the fourth spatial dimension with speed c. Within this framework, Matter is not treated as a primordial substance introduced solely through initial conditions. Universe-Created Matter (UCM) is continuously generated by the Eternal Universe within the expanding 4D Nucleus through the formation of Universe-Created Particles (UCPs).UCPs constitute a fundamental physical component of WUM. They possess definite rest energies and form a discrete multicomponent system. They participate in the formation and evolution of Macroobjects and, through specific interactions and pair-annihilation processes, in the generation of Ordinary Matter. Ensembles of UCPs carry intrinsic angular momentum, physically resembling microscopic "air vortices." WUM therefore relates the origin of Matter to the origin of angular momentum in physical systems.The purpose of the present work is to develop the UCP concept from the fundamental principles of WUM and to compare the predicted particle spectrum with independent astronomical and experimental observations. Particular attention is given to particle-specific quantitative signatures and to theoretically related UCP couples, for which correlated observational evidence can provide a substantially stronger test than isolated spectral correspondences. The broader physical roles of UCM—including the formation of the Cosmic Medium, the operation of UCP Annihilation Reactors, the generation of Ordinary Matter, and the proposed microscopic mechanism of Gravitation—are also considered.The central question addressed in this paper is: Do independently observed phenomena provide quantitative evidence for the system of Universe-Created Particles predicted by WUM? The objective is not merely to identify qualitative similarities, but to determine whether the predicted rest energies, physical products, astrophysical manifestations, and interconnected physical roles of the complete UCP—UCM system have quantitative counterparts in Nature.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[9] ai.viXra.org:2609.0036 [pdf] submitted on 2026-09-16 20:34:26
Authors: Pedro A. Kubitschek Homem de Carvalho
Comments: 7 Pages.
Can gravitational geometry arise as a collective response without postulating a fundamentalgraviton? We investigate this possibility within the Principium Geometricum (PG) program, inwhich local sectors are restrictions of a global state and toroidal phase and breathing variablesare proposed as underlying degrees of freedom. A local normalization Φ = ZΘ yields K = K0Z2and β = β0Z, preserving β2/K. An exact change-of-variable test shows, however, that thisidentity alone produces no new gravitational observable: when all gradient terms are retained, Z cancels from the physical potential Ψ = βΘ. A physical toroidal mechanism must therefore modify the source energy or introduce independently derived interactions. Conditional on universal clock coupling, the source is total energy, and a static gapless sector yields a Poisson equation and inverse-square acceleration. A reciprocal exponential metric reproduces the static weak-field coefficients γ = β = 1, but its exterior Einstein tensor is nonzero at nonlinear order. The construction thus provides an effective framework and a precise set of consistency tests, rather than a completed quantum theory of gravity. Its central open problem is to derive source energies, constitutive coefficients, and gravitational dynamics from the same microscopic theory. A fundamental graviton is not assumed; emergent graviton-like excitations are neither derived nor excluded.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[8] ai.viXra.org:2609.0033 [pdf] submitted on 2026-09-14 14:25:49
Authors: Arieh Sher
Comments: 8 Pages.
We investigate the kinematic and morphological properties of disk and spiral galaxies withinthe Pivot Universe (PU) theoretical framework. In this model, the persistent flattening of galacticrotation curves is attributed to an asymptotic background spacetime frame-dragging field (Ω0)induced by the cosmic Kerr pivot, eliminating the need for cold dark matter (CDM) halos. Bycoupling the local baryonic mass distribution to this background metric acceleration field (a0), theBaryonic Tully-Fisher Relation (V 4flat ∝ Ga0Mb) is derived directly from first principles.Furthermore, we examine galactic morphology resulting from continuous ballistic mass ejectionfrom rotating antipodal nozzles anchored to central supermassive black holes (SMBHs). Whileinitial formulations assumed Archimedean spirals (r ≈ bθ), we demonstrate that transitioningto a logarithmic spiral geometry (r = aebθ) is physically required to resolve the outer windingproblem and preserve self-similarity. We show that a logarithmic geometry naturally couples withan asymptotically flat rotation curve (vϕ = const), as the required angular dragging frequencyscales as ω(r) ∝ 1/r.Analytical rotation curves and structural models are derived and benchmarked against empiricalobservations for the Milky Way, the grand-design spiral NGC 5457 (M101), the barred lenticulargalaxy NGC 2787, and the Whirlpool Galaxy (M51). Finally, we introduce a non-linear tidalperturbation correction term, δr(θ), demonstrating how external gravitational interactions withsatellite dwarf galaxies (such as NGC 5474) break intrinsic m = 2 antipodal symmetry to producethe observed lopsidedness and arm elongation in M101.Keywords: Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics — Galaxies: spiral — Galaxies: structure — Cosmology: theory — Metric frame-dragging — Tully-Fisher relatio
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[7] ai.viXra.org:2609.0032 [pdf] submitted on 2026-09-14 19:53:15
Authors: Arieh Sher
Comments: 8 Pages. (Note by ai.viXra.org Admin: Please cite all listed scientific references)
We present an exact mathematical formulation of cosmological orbital kinematics in a rotating Kerrspacetime anchored by an ultra-massive central core of mass MP = 7.82 × 1053 kg. In this configuration:1. The outer event horizon is situated at r+ = 122.764 Gly, and the cosmological matter disk is locatedstrictly outside the event horizon spanning radii r ∈ [122.764 Gly, 175.6 Gly].2. The Milky Way is located in the immediate exterior vicinity of the horizon at RMW = 123.3265 Gly,corresponding to a radial clearance of ∆r = +0.5625 Gly (562.5 Mly or a 0.46% fractional margin).3. The cosmic trajectory is traced continuously from the central Pivot (r → 0) up to the Milky Wayalong a self-similar, scale-invariant logarithmic spiral r(ϕ) = r0ebϕ.4. We demonstrate that the logarithmic spiral (and not the Archimedean spiral) trajectory can bemathematically equivalent to a geodesic; however, this is correct only in an effective flowingfluid metric as formulated in Sher (2017), whereas it is not valid as a geodesic in pure vacuumKerr or Schwarzschild spacetime.5. We enforce the strict dynamical equivalence condition vN (L) = vKerr, where vN (L) ≡pGMP /L isthe modified Newtonian velocity evaluated along the cumulative worldline arc length L, and vKerris the coordinate frame-dragging velocity at radial separation RMW.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[6] ai.viXra.org:2609.0029 [pdf] submitted on 2026-09-13 13:13:00
Authors: Kerényi József
Comments: 6 Pages.
We propose a unified phenomenological model based on relativistic gravitational impedance, Zeff = eta * G / c. The central observation is that the longitudinal mass flux Ig = d(gamma m0)/dt, proportional to the scalar product v dot a, defines a specific potential Phi_g = Zeff * Ig whose sign is set by v dot a. Longitudinal acceleration (v dot a > 0) corresponds to energy release with equation of state w -> -1 (dark energy phase), while deceleration (v dot a < 0) corresponds to absorption with w -> 0 (dark matter phase). The bare impedance Zg = G/c gives rho_g ~ 4e-36 J/m3 ~ 1e-27 rho_Lambda for the Milky Way, requiring amplification eta ~ 1e27 for cosmic acceleration and eta ~ 1e6 for the MOND acceleration a0 ~ 1.2e-10 m/s2, parametrized as a0 = eta * (Delta V)^2 / R_H. In the low-acceleration limit we derive v_c^4 = G M a0 from equilibrium v_c^2 = Phi_g. The model provides a single language for both dark components with falsifiable predictions for lensing near jets and Gaia streaming.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[5] ai.viXra.org:2609.0024 [pdf] submitted on 2026-09-10 01:50:38
Authors: Adilson Gonçalo
Comments: 39 Pages. In Portuguese
This article constitutes the second part of the series "Space-Time" from a Realist Perspective. Continuing the analysis developed in the first part, the present work primarily aims to examine the compatibility between classical mechanicsand electromagnetism, with particular attention to the relationship between Galilean transformations and Maxwell’s equations, an issue traditionally presented as one of the main motivations for introducing Lorentz transformations and formulating the Theory of Special Relativity. It is investigated whether the alleged incompatibility between thesetheoretical frameworks necessarily arises from physical phenomena or is instead related to the way the electromagnetic and kinematic quantities involved are interpreted. To guide this analysis, principles underlying the adopted approachare first established. Based on these principles, the concept of spacetime interval in the Einsteinian relativistic formulation and its invariance under coordinate transformations are examined. Subsequently, the relationship betweenGalilean transformations and Maxwell’s equations is analyzed, including the invariance of these equations under Galilean transformations and the transformations of the electric and magnetic fields between reference frames in relative motion. In addition, the conventional interpretation of the phenomenon of magnetic induction is examined. This second part remains restricted to the theoretical, mathematical, and conceptual analysis of these issues. Thediscussion of the main experiments and observations traditionally presented as confirmations of Einsteinian relativity will be developed in the third and fourth parts of the series.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[4] ai.viXra.org:2609.0018 [pdf] replaced on 2026-10-07 11:57:25
Authors: Arieh Sher
Comments: 20 Pages.
The observed motion of the Solar System and the Local Group relative to the cosmicmicrowave background (CMB) is conventionally interpreted as a peculiar velocity produced bythe gravitational influence of the surrounding large-scale matter distribution, including the Virgoregion, the Great Attractor, the Shapley concentration, and cosmic voids. The Solar-Systembarycenter moves relative to the CMB at approximately 369.8 kms−1, while transformation tothe Local-Group barycenter gives a velocity of approximately 627 kms−1. This paper examinesan alternative interpretation within the Pivot Universe (PU) model. The universe is treated asa rotating system described approximately by Kerr geometry generated by a central massiverotating Pivot. Matter in the observable universe is assumed to participate approximately in theframe-dragged rotation generated by the Pivot. For MP = 7.82 × 1053 kg, JP = 1.06×1087 Js,RMW =123.3265 Gly, and RCMB = 123.36 Gly, the Kerr frame-dragging angular velocity at theMilky-Way shell is approximately 0.313 × 10−13radyr−1. A locally normalized differential Kerrquantity between the MW and CMB shells is approximately 495 kms−1. This value lies betweenthe Solar-System/CMB and Local-Group/CMB velocities, but it is shown that this numericalcorrespondence cannot itself be identified with an invariant relative velocity. An invariant Kerrphoton-frequency calculation instead separates a predominantly gravitational monopole shiftfrom a much smaller directional frame-dragging contribution. The PU interpretation thereforerequires the observed CMB dipole to contain a combination of global Kerr geometry and localpeculiar motions. The model yields quantitative predictions that can, in principle, be testedagainst the direction and magnitude of observed large-scale peculiar-velocity fields.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[3] ai.viXra.org:2609.0015 [pdf] submitted on 2026-09-07 19:28:03
Authors: Arieh Sher
Comments: 14 Pages.
Newton’s law of gravitation and Einstein’s General Relativity describe gravity in fundamentally different ways. Newtonian theory treats gravity as an interaction between masses,whereas General Relativity describes gravity through spacetime geometry. Nevertheless,Newtonian gravity remains an excellent approximation in appropriate weak-field conditions.This paper considers a possible connection between the two descriptions within the PivotUniverse (PU) model. The universe is assumed to contain a central massive rotating object,called the Pivot, whose angular momentum produces large-scale Kerr frame dragging. Matteris proposed to move with this rotating spacetime rather than through an otherwise stationaryspace.A further hypothesis is examined. In the usual Newtonian circular-orbit relation,v^2 = GM/R, R represents radial distance from the gravitating body. The PU model considers whether, for matter following an extremely long spiral trajectory generated by frame dragging, aneffective dynamical length L could replace R,v^2 = GM/L
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[2] ai.viXra.org:2609.0010 [pdf] submitted on 2026-09-06 20:08:25
Authors: Hani Abdel-Rahim
Comments: 13 Pages.
We present a self-consistent cyclic cosmological framework that resolves the origin, nature, and observed abundance (∼ 85%) of dark matter without introducing hypothetical elementary particles. We propose that dark matter consists oftopologically neutral solitonic states (ΦDM) produced exclusively within black holecores from preceding cosmic cycles, where unphysical singularities are replaced bya finite Planck-density threshold (ρPlanck). Protected by a conserved topologicalwinding number W ∈ Z, these states are immune to perturbative decay. We introduce the Cyclic Distillation mechanism, showing how stochastic fluctuations within black holes break matter-antimatter symmetry across cycles, exhausting antimatter while leaving a residual baryonic fraction (∼ 15%) and an accumulating dark matterbackground. Under Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC), the bounce density remains strictly lower than the black hole internal core density (ρbounce < ρPlanck). This Differential Stability Threshold ensures the dissolution of geometric event horizons and the liberation of ΦDM without disrupting its topological structure. The quantum gravitational wave energy released during horizon dissolution drives cosmic expansion and naturally reheats the universe without an inflaton field. Finally, we model intra-cycle accretion, demonstrating how progressive mass-spectrum shifts culminatein an eternal, entropy-resolving final collapse.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology
[1] ai.viXra.org:2609.0002 [pdf] submitted on 2026-09-01 20:28:01
Authors: Adilson Gonçalo
Comments: 36 Pages. In Portuguese
This article inaugurates a series dedicated to the theme "Space-Time" from a Realist Perspective. The aim of the series is to carry out a critical analysis of the Lorentz transformations and, consequently, of theTheory of Special Relativity (SR), while proposing an alternative conceptual approach to space-time grounded in principles considered more consistent with observable physical reality In this first part, the physical, mathematical, and logical foundations associated with the Lorentz transformations are examined,with emphasis on the conceptual and kinematic aspects of their construction. The article begins with a concise presentation of the theory and its fundamental equations, followed by an analysis of the points that, according to this approach, raise questions regarding the conceptual consistency of the relativisticformulation. It should be emphasized that this stage of the work focuses exclusively on the theoretical and conceptual structure of SR. The discussion of experimental and observational aspects will be addressed in the third part of the series. Although the considerations developed in this work are mainly focused on SR,they will also address certain conceptual aspects of the Theory of General Relativity. It is important to note that the considerations presented here are not intended to diminish the fundamental contributions of the creators of Special and General Relativity, among whom Henri Poincaré, Hendrik Lorentz, and Albert Einstein stand out.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology