Relativity and Cosmology |
Authors: Rüdiger Giesel
We propose that the Hubble tension can be understood as a dynamical consequence of octonionic non-associativity. A physically relevant realization requires a genuinely nontrivial associator sector, which necessarily involves multiple octonionic fields. We therefore construct the minimal triplet model with three octonion-valued scalar fields and a covariant associator norm contribution ∥A(Ψ1,Ψ2,Ψ3)∥2 in the action. From this action we derive the Einstein equations, the coupled octonionic matter equations, and the homogeneous FLRW reduction. In the resulting effectivecosmology, the associator sector can be suppressed in the early universe while remaining nonzero at late times, thereby generating a redshift-dependent deformation of the expansion history. This produces a framework in which early-universe observables remain close to the standard backgroundwhile late-time observables can infer a larger effective Hubble scale. We also formulate a directly testable phenomenological parametrization suitable for confrontation with Pantheon+ and DESI DR2. Current data do not yet establish a unique global best fit for the octonionic parameters, but they do show that a late-time, redshift-dependent departure from strict ΛCDM remains phenomenologically viable and is qualitatively aligned with the kind of deformation generated by the octonionic associator sector.
Comments: 16 Pages. (Note by ai.viXra.org Admin: Please cite listed scientific references)
Download: PDF
[v1] 2026-04-13 01:10:35
Unique-IP document downloads: 24 times
ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.