High Energy Particle Physics |
Authors: Jason Merwin
We present pre-registered, cryptographically frozen structural predictions for CMS Run-3 dijet angular distributions (1/σ) dσ/dχ at 13.6 TeV, derived from the Discrete Emergent Universe (DEU) computational framework. Under a single published energy anchor (E24 ↔ 6.14 TeV) and a two-stage pre-registration protocol frozen before any profiling simulation existed, the model predicts: a pre-boundary excess accumulating at 1 < χ < 2 with a soft-wall deficit immediately above χ = 2 in the 7—8 TeV dijet mass bin; and, above 8 TeV, an inversion of the post-boundary deficit to a weak excess as the boundary softens and leaks, with the negative step S∗ and edge-log-drop ∆∗ persisting in both bins. All prediction values trace through SHA-256 hashes to simulation instruments certified row-exact against the archived output of the original DEU collision campaign. We additionally report the profiling ladder beyond the scored range, which exhibits a previously uncharacterized regime of simultaneous channel extinction, and an exploratory analysis of collision phenomenology versus foam age whose central qualitative claims are shown to be robust across a declared band of instrument-reconstruction uncertainties. Negative results obtained during the campaign are documented with the same prominence as positive findings.
Comments: 8 Pages. Links to the repository are locked Zenodo releases are provided
Download: PDF
[v1] 2026-07-23 06:20:48
Unique-IP document downloads: 24 times
ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.