Mathematical Physics |
Authors: Lluis Eriksson
We report a complete formalization, in Lean 4 over Mathlib, of volume-uniform Wilson-loop area laws for SU(Nc) lattice gauge theory in an explicit strong-coupling window - including the case of the exact Wilson Boltzmann factor, not a linearized surrogate. The headline theorem bounds the normalized Wilson-loop expectation by Nc eP·4dK σArea(C) eP·4dS(σ), where Area(C) is an intrinsic combinatorial filling area of the loop, P is its edge-support size, and every constant is volume-free: the bound holds uniformly over all finite lattice sizes. The partition function is cancelled through a fully formalized volume-restricted cluster expansion (loop-tagged factorization, restricted Mayer inversion, Z-ratio bounds, and a pinned-gas resummation built on a Kotecky-Preiss layer with Penrose-style spanning-tree counting). A reusable repackaging converts the bound into manifest exponential area decay with a strictly positive string tension, and the non-vacuity of every hypothesis window is itself machine-checked - both the cluster smallness window and the decay-repackaging window, the latter with an explicit witness of tension log 2 - 1/2. For every exported theorem in this chain the Lean kernel's axiom oracle reports exactly [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]; there is no sorry and no project axiom in the dependency cone. To our knowledge this is the first machine-checked cluster-expansion proof in lattice quantum field theory. All artifacts are public, with per-theorem oracle records in a verification ledger and continuous-integration builds.
Comments: 6 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2026-07-02 21:47:02
Unique-IP document downloads: 120 times
ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.