Quantum Gravity and String Theory

Quantum Linearity from Gravitational Record Erasure

Authors: Hong Zhang

Quantum linearity is usually postulated rather than derived. We ask: under what microscopic conditions on a quantum-gravity regulator does linearity follow from the erasure structure of gravitational records? Two results are established. A no-go theorem shows that gravitational records and primitive erasure do not by themselves enforce linearity: a stationary nonlinear anomaly can always be constructed unless a microscopic Ward, modular, or constraint identity removes it. A conditional closure theorem then shows that, if a finite regulator satisfies five conditions---a projective record system, a uniform erasure resolvent, stationary anomaly cancellation, transport-exactness, and a bounded contracting homotopy for a two-term Koszul causal complex---the record-erased operational dynamics converges to an affine quantum channel with an explicit error bound. All five conditions are instantiated in four quantum-gravity regulators: JT gravity (via the SL (2, R) Schwarzian Ward identity on the non-identity primary sector), an AdS--Rindler entanglement wedge (via the JLMS first law), a finite-cutoff holographic operator-algebra code (via the gauge--logical dichotomy), and a spin-network corner (via Peter--Weyl averaging, subject to an explicit singlet-exclusion assumption). This is not a derivation of linearity for the real universe; it is a finite-regulator conditional theorem that reduces quantum linearity to a checkable list of microscopic identities.

Comments: 52 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-05-29 00:37:20

Unique-IP document downloads: 41 times

ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.