Astrophysics |
Authors: Penghong Jiao
The LambdaCDM model confronts two increasingly significant observational conflicts: the Hubble constant H0 tension (+8.3%, >5 sigma) and the S8 tension (-8.4%, ~3 sigma). The near-identical absolute magnitudes and opposite signs of these deviations suggest a common kinematic origin rather than modifications to the cosmic energy budget. We propose a phenomenological framework in which physical proper time tau is an emergent order parameter of energy flux from higher dimensions into the 3-dimensional observable space, satisfying d tau = a(t)^{-1} d t. This yields a proper-time rate gamma(z) = d tau/dt = 1+z. Introducing a single empirical parameter Q calibrated by the observed H0 tension, the model yields an effective late-time factor gamma_late ≃ 1.083, from which the S8 tension and f sigma8 suppression follow with no additional free parameters, driven by a dynamical competition between the constant thrust from Q and the standard LambdaCDM Hubble drag. The same time-flow mechanism naturally suppresses the growth of cosmic structure, giving S8_obs ≃ 0.772, in excellent agreement with weak lensing measurements. The Friedmann equations retain their standard geometric form; the acceleration driver is the injected free-energy flux rho_de rather than an ad hoc cosmological constant. The model distinguishes between instantaneous and cumulative cosmological observables, with time-dilation measurements remaining unchanged while integrated quantities such as H0, S8 and f sigma8 exhibit the observed ~8% shifts.
Comments: 11 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2026-04-27 16:48:24
Unique-IP document downloads: 5 times
ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.