High Energy Particle Physics

Relational Mathematical Realism: Registry Architecture Predicts Lepton, Baryon, and Strange Baryon Mass Spectra

Authors: Jason Merwin

We present Relational Mathematical Realism (RMR), a discrete framework in which physicalreality emerges from relational updates on a 137-element integer registry. Five structural primitives tetrahedral vacuum geometry, registry partition, graph resonance dynamics, sector mapping, and overflow-fission mechanics — are stated axiomatically and used to derive eight quantitative predictions with no tunable continuous parameters: three charged lepton mass ratios, one neutrino mass-squared splitting ratio, one baryon mass ratio, and three strange baryon mass predictions. All eight agree with experiment to better than 1.1%. The central finding is that the integer set {137, 136, 17, 3} — the registry total, its substrate factor, the substrate prime from 136 = 8 × 17,and the K3 graph order — appears without modification across every sector. We employ an honestthree-tier classification: five predictions [T1] follow strictly from the primitives; three [T2] require two structural postulates whose numerical content is fixed by the same integers but whose derivation from the base primitives remains open. The Gell-Mann—Okubo baryon octet relation emerges as a structural identity. We catalog eleven open questions by tractability and identify JUNO and DUNE as the decisive near-term falsification tests via the integer prediction R ≡ Δm2 32/Δm2 21 = 33.

Comments: 21 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-03-14 16:42:49

Unique-IP document downloads: 78 times

ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.