[2] ai.viXra.org:2506.0036 [pdf] submitted on 2025-06-08 21:48:55
Authors: Atif sarwar
Comments: 6 Pages. (Note by ai.viXra.org Admin: Please cite and list sceintific references)
This theory proposes that mass is not a fundamental quantity, but rather emerges from localized, self-sustaining configurations of electromagnetic (EM) energy. All known particle properties — mass, charge, inertia, spin, and even gravitational interaction — arise as manifestations of the geometry and dynamics of these EM fields. The aim is to build a unified field-based framework connecting electrodynamics, quantum mechanics, and general relativity.
Category: Nuclear and Atomic Physics
[1] ai.viXra.org:2506.0001 [pdf] submitted on 2025-06-01 21:13:18
Authors: Andre Heinecke
Comments: 18 Pages. The full repository is available at: https://git.esus.name/esus/spin_paper
Current quantum mechanics treats atoms as two-dimensional systems with abstract angular momentum quantum numbers. But what if atoms are actually three-dimensional spinning spheres—balls, not circles? This simple conceptual shift leads to a profound mathematical result:the electromagnetic force binding electrons to nuclei emerges naturally from 3D rotational geometry, with zero free parameters.We demonstrate that the formula F = ℏ²s³/(mr³ ), where s = mvr/ℏ is calculated from observables, exactly reproduces the Coulomb force forhydrogen (agreement: 99.9%). Remarkably, this same geometric principle works across the periodic table: helium (99.5%), carbon (99.4%), iron (98.8%), and gold with relativisticcorrections (99.3%). These results emerged from a deeper philosophical insight: gravity is the centripetal force of spacetime. When you stand on Earth, what you call gravity is simply the centripetal force required to keep you moving with the spinning reference frame. This thought, though it may have led us into speculativeterritory, guided our exploration across scales and revealed that electromagnetic force may be quantum gravity in disguise—the centripetalrequirement of 3D atomic rotation. The implications are striking: (1) Standing on a hydrogen atom would provide the same rotational reference frame as standing on Earth, just 1020 times stronger; (2) The hierarchy problem dissolves if all forces are the same geometryat different scales; (3) We are not cosmic wanderers but forever bound to our local universe by invisible threads of spacetime rotation. While this "atoms are balls" framework cannot replace dark matter at galacticscales, its success across the periodic table using zero fitting parameters suggests we may have been missing something fundamental about atomic structure. Sometimes the deepest insights come from the simplest questions: Are atoms really flat circles, or are they spinning balls?
Category: Nuclear and Atomic Physics