Physics of Biology

The Stern Layer Contribution to Electromagnetic Absorption in Biological Skin

Authors: Luisiana X. Cundin, William P. Roach

Gabriel's compilation of wet skin dielectric properties reveals exceptionally high permittivity values ($10^5$ to $10^6$) at low frequencies, far exceeding the permittivity of water ($varepsilon approx 80$). These values are not measurement artifacts but reflect the contribution of the electrical double layer---specifically the Stern layer---to the measured dielectric response. The Stern layer confounds dielectric measurements by introducing a multiplicative capacitive contribution that masks the tissue's true dielectric properties. Using the Maxwell-Wagner transformation, $varepsilon_r'' = varepsilon_0 omega sigma_{text{exp}}'$, from the Cundin-Roach Kramers-Kronig analysis, we recover the intrinsic tissue absorption. The corrected absorption values are consistent with pure liquid water, confirming that biological tissue is fundamentally a water-based dielectric whose low-frequency response is dominated by the Stern layer capacitance. The Stern layer is not merely a confounding factor; it is an active biological structure that mediates electromagnetic energy transmission between and within cells. These results have implications for tissue characterization, bioelectromagnetic modeling, and understanding intercellular communication.

Comments: 9 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-06-26 20:27:10

Unique-IP document downloads: 44 times

ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.