This paper continues an earlier experiment in prompt-based political reasoning by askingwhether narrative-driven discussion can be partially replaced by an axiomatic sequence ofprompts. The point of departure is a deliberately strong initial prompt concerning Russia’s forced federalization and demilitarization, treated not as a conclusion to be debated but as a working axiom from which further prompts can be generated. The paper argues that conventional political discussion, whether human or AI-assisted, tends tobecome trapped in normative reformulations, objections, and rhetorical loops that obscure rather than clarify reality. In contrast, the proposed method seeks prompts that are increasingly descriptive rather than normative, so that they function as compact pictures of reality rather than as wish-expressive political narratives. Using the war in Ukraine and the contemporary Russian imperial system as a test case, the paper shows how an initial prompt can generate a sequence of further prompts describing military deadlock, imperial self-destruction, social degradation, and the internal human cost of the Russian system. Particular emphasis is placed on the claim that the first victims of an imperial order may be the people living within it, and that this perspective remains largely invisible instandard Western political discourse.The paper does not present a finished formal theory. Instead, it offers a first methodological step toward a prompt-based axiomatics in which political reasoning proceeds by making assumptions explicit, refining them through further prompts, and replacing language-modelled narrative patterns with existence-guided pictures of reality.