Artificial Intelligence

Knowledge Elicitation Through Conversational AI

Authors: Leszek J. Cierniak

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities but suffer from static knowledge bases frozen at training time and inability to persistently accumulate new information from interactions. Despite progress in memory-augmented LLMs, no existing system provides a structured, interactive framework for resolving the inevitable conflicts that arise when humans teach knowledge to an AI through dialogue. This research proposal presents a novel cognitive architecture for knowledge elicitation where a frozen LLM builds and maintains an external knowledge graph through natural language dialogue, starting from *tabula rasa*. We introduce the first hierarchical, interactive conflict resolution taxonomy specifically designed for dialogue-driven knowledge-graph construction in frozen-LLM architectures, systematically addressing temporal state changes, cardinality violations, entity canonicalization conflicts, and logical contradictions. The architecture decouples reasoning (LLM) from memory (hybrid vector store and property graph), enabling model-agnostic operation while maintaining full explainability through externalized knowledge representation. This work advances Explainable AI by making the system's mental model fully inspectable, correctable, and transferable across LLM backends.

Comments: 13 Pages. A Research Proposal for AI/LLM Extension

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-05-27 10:34:25

Unique-IP document downloads: 53 times

ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.